Hello and welcome to the details of US Supreme Court rules against Warner Music in copyright damages case and now with the details
Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - The US Supreme Court today ruled in favour of a Miami music producer in a legal fight with Warner Music over a song by rapper Flo Rida. — AFP pic
WASHINGTON, May 9 — The US Supreme Court today ruled in favour of a Miami music producer in a legal fight with Warner Music over a song by rapper Flo Rida, finding that there is no time limit for recovering monetary damages in copyright cases that have been filed before the expiration of a statute of limitations.
The 6-3 ruling, authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan, affirmed a lower court’s decision that favoured producer Sherman Nealy, who sued a Warner subsidiary and others in Florida federal court in 2018.
Nealy has said that his label Music Specialist owns rights to the electronic dance song Jam the Box by Tony Butler, also known as Pretty Tony. Warner artist Flo Rida, whose given name is Tramar Dillard, incorporated elements of Jam the Box into his 2008 song In the Ayer.
Nealy sued music publishing company Warner Chappell and others, arguing that they took an invalid license to Jam the Box from Butler, his former business partner, while Nealy was incarcerated for cocaine distribution. The producer requested damages for alleged copyright infringement dating back to 2008.
Advertisement
A federal judge decided that Nealy could recover damages only for infringement that happened during the three years before he filed the lawsuit, based on the US statute of limitations for bringing a copyright-infringement case after discovering a claim. The Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision and said there was “no bar to damages in a timely action.”
The Supreme Court upheld the 11th Circuit’s ruling today.
“The Copyright Act entitles a copyright owner to recover damages for any timely claim,” Kagan wrote, referring to the 1976 federal law at issue in the case.
Advertisement
“If Nealy’s claims are thus timely, he may obtain damages for them,” Kagan added.
Warner declined comment. A lawyer for Nealy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
During Supreme Court arguments in February, some of the justices indicated they could not decide the case before reconsidering the issue of statute of limitations in a separate dispute before them. The justices are currently deliberating whether to take up the “discovery rule” in a copyright dispute between Hearst Newspapers and photographer Antonio Martinelli.
“What concerns me is that we are being asked to decide a question that may be eliminated based on a subsequent decision” on whether the “discovery rule” applies, conservative Justice Samuel Alito said during the arguments.
Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch echoed Alito’s statements in a dissenting opinion on Thursday that was joined by Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas. — Reuters
These were the details of the news US Supreme Court rules against Warner Music in copyright damages case for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.
