Dangerous details are revealed by the Saudi police … The bribed...

After the resounding scandal in the Saudi society with the news of the arrest of 8 judges and a court president on charges of corruption, bribery and money laundering, the threads of the case began to unfold at the hands of the Saudi security services, who raided everyone at dawn.

Hearings began in the trial of a presiding judge who revealed new details in the case file. Informed sources reported that the Department of Job Corruption in the prosecution asked the competent authority to provide it with the cases that he pursued and carried out by the arrested accused, whether he was a judge or president of the court. For auditing and reviewing some of the names mentioned in a number of the cases under review and scrutiny, while the trials of 4 other accused persons who were arrested with the president of the court are continuing.

According to the newspaper “Okaz”, the intensive investigations with the president of the court included the interrogation of two defendants who had a relationship with the accused judge and parties familiar with, observing, and interfering in the cases. The prosecution tracked the bank accounts of the accused.

According to the indictment, the prosecution questioned the accused judge regarding the various charges and the job, financial and administrative corruption directed against him, then he denied them, and stated that he was working as a judge and head of a court, and he was arrested upon his visit as a friend, and he did not know the reason for his arrest, and he indicated in his statements that one of those arrested had a friendship relationship with him. He did not provide him with any services or for others, whether for or without compensation, and he denied his response to the release of any accused or interference in cases pending before the court.

Public Prosecution: Denial does not help

The Public Prosecution confirmed that the accused’s denial of the charges against him is an attempt to evade criminal responsibility, and the denial refutes what was confirmed by the proven and documented facts of arrest and search and digital evidence during monitoring and follow-up of the case parties, which necessitates not paying attention to that denial and disregarding it. The public prosecutor demands that the charges against the judge and those with him be proven and punished according to the anti-bribery system, the anti-money laundering system, and the information crime system, their discretion in the criminal procedures system, the confiscation of the amount arrested in his possession, the confiscation of the mobile devices that were seized with him for use in the crimes attributed to him, and his prevention From travel, and honor it according to the law.

The accused judge: I am a victim of a conspiracy!

The prosecution asked the president of the court about the secret of the sum seized in the official car in his possession, which is estimated at 250 thousand riyals. He stressed that he adheres to his legal and statutory right, and the prosecution responded that it granted him this right and enabled him to contact whomever he wanted upon arrest, and the prosecution decided to stop the interrogation sessions and set a later date for his lawyer to attend the investigation session, and the accused judge denied his relationship with any of the arrested accused.

Regarding the documents that were seized in the possession of one of his friends arrested, the accused judge replied that obtaining these papers and judgments is available through the Ministry’s portal and is not considered an offense or a crime in addition to the fact that the litigation sessions are public, and he denied in the investigation that he had revealed any details of any cases of men Actions that have been commented on and asked about by one of those arrested.

The prosecution concluded that the accused judge was charged with bribery, being a public employee and in his position he committed the crime of bribery (bribe) by breaching his job duties and responding to a request and mediation by providing another accused with information and pictures of seized judgments for cases, as the applicant for the documents has no capacity, so the crime was completed. The prosecution also directed the (blind man) judge to commit the crime of money laundering for possessing an amount of money that was seized in the official car delivered to him, concealing the source of the money, refusing to disclose it, and denying his relationship to the amount, which confirms to the prosecution the illegality of the amount according to the indictment.

In the context of the charges, the prosecution presented more than 35 evidence and evidence against the judge and those with him, including digital evidence, photos, videos, confessions and confessions of the defendants.

Follow the world news from the statement via Google News

Print
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pin Interest
Whats App