Hello and welcome to the details of Can Trump end US birthright citizenship? A look at its history, Trump’s plan and legal hurdles and now with the details
Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - A sailboat passes by the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor, in New York City September 20, 2024. — Reuters pic
WASHINGTON, Dec 21 — Donald Trump has said he plans to end birthright citizenship as part of his promised crackdown on immigration when he becomes president on January 20.
Below is a look at US birthright citizenship and Trump’s legal authority to restrict it.
What is birthright citizenship?
Anyone born in the United States is considered a citizen at birth, which derives from the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment, which was added to the Constitution in 1868. The amendment states: “All persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 also defines citizens and includes similar language.
There were an estimated 11 million immigrants in the US illegally in January 2022, according to a US Department of Homeland Security estimate, a figure that some analysts now place at 13 million to 14 million. Their US-born children are considered by the government to have US citizenship. Trump has complained about foreign women visiting the United States for the purpose of giving birth and conferring US citizenship on their offspring.
Are there exceptions?
Yes. People born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer with diplomatic immunity are not US citizens because they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
A woman sits on the steps of the US Supreme Court in Washington August 14, 2024. — Reuters pic
What has the Supreme Court said?
The Supreme Court has not addressed whether the Citizenship Clause applies to US-born children of people who are in the United States illegally.
The main birthright citizenship case is from 1898, when the Supreme Court ruled that the son of lawful immigrants from China was a US citizen by virtue of his birth in 1873 in San Francisco. The man, Wong Kim Ark, had been denied re-entry to the United States after a visit to China at a time when immigration from China was severely restricted.
The Supreme Court also ruled in 1884 in a dispute over voter registration that US-born John Elk was not a citizen because he was born as a member of a Native American tribe and therefore not subject to US jurisdiction. Congress extended US citizenship to Native Americans in 1924.
Some scholars argue that if lawmakers wanted all people born in the country to be citizens, they would not have added the clause to the 14th Amendment specifying that citizens ‘be subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States. — AFP pic
What is the view of opponents of birthright citizenship?
Some scholars argue that if lawmakers wanted all people born in the country to be citizens, they would not have added the clause to the 14th Amendment specifying that citizens “be subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.
They argue that this language excludes people who entered the country illegally and by implications, their US-born children. Republican senators Lindsey Graham from South Carolina and Tom Cotton from Arkansas proposed bills this year that defined US-born children as not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the US if their parents were in the country illegally.
Most scholars are dismissive of that interpretation of the jurisdiction language. Unlike diplomats, people in the country illegally do not have legal immunity and are subject to the US laws.
Can Trump end birthright citizenship with an executive order?
The Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate citizenship, and no president has ever tried to redefine the rules of citizenship using executive orders, though Trump promised to do so in his first term.
Trump could issue an executive order to redefine birthright citizenship. Legal experts said he might declare that it requires one parent must be a US citizen, a permanent resident or a member of the military — language that appeared in the Graham bill. He could direct his agencies to withhold passports or other documents and benefits unless the person meets the new requirement.
Anyone denied a document or benefit could challenge it and legal experts said the executive order would almost certainly be blocked immediately in the courts. But it would also put the issue on a path toward the Supreme Court and likely force the justices to determine who is entitled to birthright citizenship.
If courts decided the Constitution protected birthright citizenship, then only an amendment could change that. A Constitutional amendment would require two-thirds of both houses and approval by three-quarters of state legislatures, a process that would likely take years. The Constitution has not been amended since 1992. — Reuters
These were the details of the news Can Trump end US birthright citizenship? A look at its history, Trump’s plan and legal hurdles for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.
