Leaders of the past less trustworthy, study finds

Thank you for your reading and interest in the news Leaders of the past less trustworthy, study finds and now with details

Hind Al Soulia - Riyadh - Given that he chopped off the heads of two his six wives and performed one of the most screeching U-turns in political history, England’s infamous 16th century King Henry VIII was clearly not an easy ruler to serve.

Five centuries later, a modern computer face-processing algorithm designed to examine the nature of leadership has come up with a similar conclusion: the king who led a religious schism in Europe was not a man to be trusted.

In a fascinating study of how people perceive decision-makers throughout the ages, French researchers scrutinised facial features through portraits and concluded that modern-day leaders were more likely to be trusted than their historical counterparts.

There are some features identified linked with trust such as big eyes and a smiling mouth

Lou Safra, study author

The study, published today in the journal Nature Communications, found that the increase in trust was associated with rising living standards.

The researchers used the algorithm to rate and compare the muscle contractions of sitters in thousands of European portraits from 1500 to 2000 to assess how they would have been seen by their subjects.

Previous work has found that the size of eyes and specific muscle movements that change the shape of mouths and eyebrows are all likely to have an impact on building trust.

Lou Safra, one of the paper’s authors, said: “There are some features identified linked with trust such as big eyes and a smiling mouth. Is someone, more or less, looking like a baby.”

Social trust is seen as a measure of integrity and honesty and the extent to which people are prepared to cooperate with each other.

It has been connected to improvements in economic performance and lower crime rates.

The researchers compared the facial features of more than 6,000 portraits from 19 European countries, including one of nineteenth century London mayor Matthew Wood.

George IV, a clever but indolent king who ruled from 1820-30, was rated trustworthy based upon the algorithm’s assessment of one of his portraits.

Ms Safra, an assistant professor at Sciences Po Paris, said that whilst the portraits might not reflect the sitters’ true natures, the monarchs would have had control over how they were painted.

An 1815 portrait of Lord Mayor of London Sir Matthew Wood - the study rated him as highly trustworthy. Universal History Archive/Getty Images

The question of social trust was first asked in the 1950s, according to a blog by David Halpern who heads a former UK government unit that examined the effect of behaviour on policy.

“Social trust is a deep-seated indicator of the health of our societies and our economies. It merits much more attention than it gets,” said Mr Halpern, the chief executive of the Behavioural Insights Team.

Updated: September 22, 2020 08:08 PM

These were the details of the news Leaders of the past less trustworthy, study finds for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at The National and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

PREV The king points to the delays in the execution of this...
NEXT Finally another positive test: super efficient Anderl …