16 Oct 23:10
Despite not talking about specific plays in which the VAR acted in the match between Olimpia and Nacional, Daniel Garnero referred to the amount of time that was lost with all the revisions and interventions of the video referee, after the end of the game where his team tied 1-1 against the Academy.
“I’m not going to talk about specific plays. But I will say that there was no rhythm of the game. There was no reason why the arbitration did not give it to him, unfortunately ”, began by saying the coach of Olimpia.
“Here the game was damaged, not one team or another. The referees are seen to be hesitant, some clear offside plays allow them to continue, delay, the rhythm of the competition is lost and then things are asked of the national team. I will always say it: better courts and more rhythm of the game, generates better football. With this, the only injured party was Paraguayan football, ”Garnero said.
On the other hand, he assured that the main reason why his team could not win was the lack of effectiveness. “We control and dominate the game for a long time. We generated very clear goal situations and we couldn’t put ourselves ahead. That made the rival stay alive and we could even have lost it, “he said.
“In general we played a good game, with clear situations and as we were unable to open the scoring, it was difficult for us to control our anxiety. We have to correct the lack of effectiveness, which was decisive ”, he declared.
16 Oct 22:34
No one can deny that the party lacked seasoning. Goals disallowed, expulsions, a penalty and innumerable VAR revisions, “decorated” the tie between Olimpia and Nacional in Para Uno, in the opening of both in the Clausura tournament.
The full role was taken by the VAR and the main judge of the match, Giancarlos Juliadoza. With successes, but also with errors, the judges remain as the highlights of the game because it ended up being what it was, according to their interventions.
Four goals were disallowed, three of them due to correctly advanced positions, but one that leaves doubt, due to an alleged interference from Antolín Alcaraz to Antony Silva, in Jorge Recalde’s shot that he ended up getting.
The goals that did rise to the scoreboard, ended up arriving at the end. First, Danilo Santacruz already in addition time after a penalty, which also raised doubts, sanctioned by Juliadoza. But just a minute later, Jorge Recalde scored the tie with which the match would end, without first having one more review in VAR, with which the Olympians expected a penalty in his favor, but the judge ended up expelling Richard Ortiz and Ricardo Garay for a mutual aggression.
As for football, Olimpia was superior. He gave a lot of speed to his attacks especially in the first part of the game. Before the minute of the game he had already scored the first goal, which did not go up to the scoreboard due to Camacho’s advanced position, but began to show that he was taking advantage of the defensive lack of coordination of Rodrigo López’s team in the attempt to reduce and keep the defensive line close to half court.
But the speed of his men from midfield up, were also made effective by Nacional. Shortly after, a ball behind the back of the Dean’s centrals, put Franco Costa face to face with Daniel Azcona, faced him and defined with a blank goal, but the flag was also up and the VAR ratified the forward position of the winger tricolor.
Olimpia continued to tread better the rival terrain. Recalde always participative, it was the most important thing that Olimpia had and this same one reached the goal once more in the first half, but again there was an intervention of the VAR and the goal was invalidated by an alleged interference of Antolín Alcaraz. Antony Silva was also a key man in preventing Olimpia from taking the lead.
In the second half, the theme changed because Rodrigo López’s team began to show their weapons. He managed to avoid the pressure of Olimpia and generated a game circuit in the rival field, creating clear goal situations. The sides began to pass more freely, especially Espínola on the right and Danilo gained prominence.
The game had an important round trip, but after Garnero was filled with forwards, the bottom was unprotected. Thus came the penalty in favor of Nacional, for a foul by Montenegro on Espínola and that, in order not to lose the habit, was reviewed by Juliadoza in the VAR.
It seemed that Nacional took the victory, having scored in the second minute of the 7 that Juliadoza had added. But in a blink of an eye the man with the goal in the Dean, Jorge Recalde, received a ball at the head of the large area and finished off to beat Silva and tie the game.
In case one more controversy was missing from a game that was already reaching minute 105, Juliadoza was called again by the VAR to review a play between Ricardo Garay and Richard Ortiz in the Nacional area and the judge decided to expel both.
Stadium: Manuel Ferreira
Referee: Giancarlos Juliadoza
Assistants: Hugo Martínez and Luis Onieva
Fourth official: Marcos Galeano
WHERE: Carlos Paul Benitez
AVAR: Julius aranda
Goals: 90 + 2 ′ D. Santacruz, from penalty (N); 90 + 3 ′ J. Recalde (W)
Admonished: L. De la Cruz, B. Montenegro, R. Ortiz (O); E. Orzusa, C. Núñez, C. Arrúa, L. Villagra, D. Santacruz (N)
Driven out: 90 + 13 R. Ortiz (O) and R. Garay (N), both with a direct red.
OLYMPIAD: Daniel Azcona; Alan Benítez (82 ′ Brian Montenegro), Antolín Alcaraz, Diego Polenta and Iván Torres; Luis de la Cruz, Richard Ortiz, Rodrigo Rojas (67 ′ Derlis González) and Jorge Recalde; Néstor Camacho and Roque Santa Cruz (67 ′ Isidro Pitta). DT: Daniel Garnero.
NATIONAL: Antony Silva; Carlos Espínola, Claudio Núñez (59 ′ Ricardo Garay), Luis Cabral and Walter Clar; Carlos Arrúa, Edgardo Orzusa (67 ′ Víctor Cáceres), Édgar Zaracho and Franco Costa; Danilo Santacruz and Leonardo Villagra (76 ′ David Fleitas). DT: Rodrigo López.
16 Oct 21:20
General Díaz forward Sergio Bareiro was ready to take part in the match against San Lorenzo at the start of the Clausura tournament. He was announced in the starting team in the previous one, but an hour before the start, when the line-ups were announced, the attacker was not even on the substitute bench.
Some sources from the club in the city of Luque, had said that Bareiro had a picture of gastroenteritis and that is why he had to be dropped from the game against “Rayadito”.
But after the end of the game, in the press conference of coach Julio Javier Doldán, this version changed and the unknown arose. After being asked about the attacker’s situation, Doldán said: “Sergio Bareiro I think he has an important offer from a local club.”
This local club would be Cerro Porteño. The azulgrana begins to look at this opportunity, trying to “take cover” against a possible departure from Diego Churín, who is being surveyed by the Porto Alegre Gremio.
It should be remembered that Bareiro has already been sold to Necaxa de México and if he leaves General Díaz now, he will do so only for the Clausura tournament. Since January, he will have to join his new club.
*The article has been translated based on the content of Source link by https://versus.lanacion.com.py/versus/2020/10/16/garnero-sobre-el-arbitraje-el-unico-perjudicado-es-el-futbol-paraguayo/
. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.
*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!
These were the details of the news “The only one harmed is Paraguayan football” for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at en24news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.