Peruvian Selection: Audios VAR Peru vs. Brazil: Conmebol broadcast videos...

Conmebol made public the VAR analysis of the controversial plays of the match between Peru vs. Brazil, for the second day of the 2022 Qualifiers, which contains the interaction of Julio Bascuñán with the video referee assistants destined for the commitment at the National Stadium.

“We share this educational material that serves as a clarification and description of situations related to soccer, based on the VAR Protocol and the Laws of the Game of the matches corresponding to the South American Qualifiers,” said the organization.

VIDEO 3 – MINUTE 28

Peru vs. Brazil: VAR analysis of the penalty from Yoshimar Yotún to Neymar (VIDEO 3 – minute 28).

ITEM: Penalty of a penalty

A penalty kick will be awarded whenever a player commits an offense punishable by a direct free kick within his penalty area or outside the field of play as part of the game, as stipulated in Rules 12 and 13. A goal may be scored directly from a penalty kick .

Arbitration decisions

The referee will make his decisions at his discretion in accordance with the Laws of the Game and in the spirit of football. The referee’s decisions will be based on the opinion of the referee, who has the discretionary power to make the appropriate decisions within the framework of the Laws of the Game. (p. 71 Laws of the Game)

WHERE

one . Beginning

The performance of VARs in football matches is based on a series of principles that must be applied in their entirety in all matches in which they take part:

1. The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) is a member of the refereeing team with independent access to the images of the match broadcast; the VAR can assist the referee only in the event of a “clear, obvious and manifest error” or a “serious inadvertent incident” in relation to:

to. goal / no goal;

b. criminal / non-criminal;

c. direct red card (not the second yellow card / warning);

d. identity confusion (when the referee warns or expels the wrong player from the offending team).

2. The referee must always make a decision, that is, the referee may not omit a decision and subsequently resort to the VAR to make it; The decision to allow play to continue after an alleged infringement may be reviewed.

3. The initial decision made by the referee will not be modified unless the review of the play clearly shows that the decision constituted a clear, obvious and manifest error.

4. Only the referee may initiate a review; the VAR (and the rest of the members of the refereeing team) can only recommend to the referee that it be carried out.

5. The final decision will always be made by the referee, either based on the VAR information or after having carried out a review on the field of play.

6. There is no time limit for the review process, as accuracy is more important than speed.

The following are categories of decisions or incidents that can be reviewed in the event of a possible “clear, obvious and manifest error” or “serious inadvertent incident”:

criminal / non-criminal

1 Offense committed by the attacking team in the play of the incident punishable by a penalty (hand, foul, offside, etc.).

2 Ball not in play before the incident.

3 Location of the offense (inside or outside the penalty area).

4 Wrong award of a penalty.

5 Infringement punishable by a penalty not sanctioned.

  • The arbitrator must always make a decision, that is, the arbitrator may not omit a decision and subsequently resort to the VAR to make it; The decision to allow play to continue after an alleged infringement may be reviewed.
  • The initial decision made by the referee will not be modified unless the review of the play clearly shows that the decision constituted a clear, obvious and manifest error.
  • Only the arbitrator may initiate a review; the VAR (and the rest of the members of the refereeing team) can only recommend to the referee that it be carried out.
  • The final decision will always be made by the referee, either from the information of the VAR or after having carried out a review on the field of play.
  • There is no time limit for the review process, as accuracy is more important than speed.

VIDEO 4 – MINUTE 86

Peru vs. Brazil: VAR analysis of the red card to Carlos Zambrano (VIDEO 5 – minute 86).

Infractions punishable by expulsion

The player, substitute or substituted player who commits any of the following offenses must be expelled:

prevent a goal by a hand offense or avoid an obvious scoring chance (except in the case of the goalkeeper within his own area);

avoid a goal or an obvious chance of scoring by an opponent who goes to the goal of the offender by means of an offense punishable by a free kick (except those situations described below);

rough and serious play (lack of extreme toughness);

spitting or biting someone;

violent behavior;

use offensive, insulting or humiliating language or gestures;

Arbitration decisions

The referee will make his decisions at his discretion in accordance with the Laws of the Game and in the spirit of football. The referee’s decisions will be based on the opinion of the referee, who has the discretionary power to make the appropriate decisions within the framework of the Laws of the Game. (p. 71 Laws of the Game)

WHERE

one . Beginning

The performance of VARs in football matches is based on a series of principles that must be applied in their entirety in all matches in which they take part:

1. The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) is a member of the refereeing team with independent access to the images of the match broadcast; the VAR can assist the referee only in the event of a “clear, obvious and manifest error” or a “serious inadvertent incident” in relation to:

to. goal / no goal;

b. criminal / non-criminal;

c. direct red card (not the second yellow card / warning);

d. identity confusion (when the referee warns or expels the wrong player from the offending team).

2. The referee must always make a decision, that is, the referee may not omit a decision and subsequently resort to the VAR to make it; The decision to allow play to continue after an alleged infringement may be reviewed.

3. The initial decision made by the referee will not be modified unless the review of the play clearly shows that the decision constituted a clear, obvious and manifest error.

4. Only the referee may initiate a review; the VAR (and the rest of the members of the refereeing team) can only recommend to the referee that it be carried out.

5. The final decision will always be made by the referee, either based on the VAR information or after having carried out a review on the field of play.

6. There is no time limit for the review process, as accuracy is more important than speed.

The following are categories of decisions or incidents that can be reviewed in the event of a possible “clear, obvious and manifest error” or “serious inadvertent incident”:

Direct red card (not second yellow card or warning)

Avoid an obvious scoring opportunity (especially the place of the foul and the position of other players).

Rough and serious play

Violent conduct, biting or spitting at another person.

Use of offensive, insulting or humiliating gestures.

The arbitrator must always make a decision, that is, the arbitrator may not omit a decision and subsequently resort to the VAR to make it; The decision to allow play to continue after an alleged infringement may be reviewed.

two) . The initial decision made by the referee will not be modified unless the review of the play clearly shows that the decision constituted a clear, obvious and manifest error.

3) Only the referee may initiate a review; the VAR (and the rest of the members of the refereeing team) can only recommend to the referee that it be carried out.

4) The final decision will always be made by the referee, either based on the VAR information or after having carried out a review on the field of play.

5) There is no time limit for the review process, as accuracy is more important than speed.

VIDEO 5 – MINUTE: 83

Peru vs. Brazil: VAR analysis of Carlos Zambrano’s penalty against Neymar (VIDEO 4 – minute 83).

ITEM: Penalty of a penalty

A penalty kick will be awarded whenever a player commits an offense punishable by a direct free kick within his penalty area or outside the field of play as part of the game, as stipulated in Rules 12 and 13. A goal may be scored directly from a penalty kick .

Arbitration decisions

The referee will make his decisions at his discretion in accordance with the Laws of the Game and in the spirit of football. The referee’s decisions will be based on the opinion of the referee, who has the discretionary power to make the appropriate decisions within the framework of the Laws of the Game. (p. 71 Laws of the Game)

WHERE

one . Beginning

The performance of VARs in football matches is based on a series of principles that must be applied in their entirety in all matches in which they take part:

1. The Video Assistant Referee (VAR) is a member of the refereeing team with independent access to the images of the match broadcast; the VAR can assist the referee only in the event of a “clear, obvious and manifest error” or a “serious inadvertent incident” in relation to:

to. goal / no goal;

b. criminal / non-criminal;

c. direct red card (not the second yellow card / warning);

d. identity confusion (when the referee warns or expels the wrong player from the offending team).

2. The referee must always make a decision, that is, the referee may not omit a decision and subsequently resort to the VAR to make it; The decision to allow play to continue after an alleged infringement may be reviewed.

3. The initial decision made by the referee will not be modified unless the review of the play clearly shows that the decision constituted a clear, obvious and manifest error.

4. Only the referee may initiate a review; the VAR (and the rest of the members of the refereeing team) can only recommend to the referee that it be carried out.

5. The final decision will always be made by the referee, either based on the VAR information or after having carried out a review on the field of play.

6. There is no time limit for the review process, as accuracy is more important than speed.

The following are categories of decisions or incidents that can be reviewed in the event of a possible “clear, obvious and manifest error” or “serious inadvertent incident”:

criminal / non-criminal

1 Offense committed by the attacking team in the play of the incident punishable by a penalty (hand, foul, offside, etc.).

2 Ball not in play before the incident.

3 Location of the offense (inside or outside the penalty area).

4 Wrong award of a penalty.

5 Infringement punishable by a penalty not sanctioned.

IT MAY INTEREST YOU

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!

These were the details of the news Peruvian Selection: Audios VAR Peru vs. Brazil: Conmebol broadcast videos... for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at en24news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

NEXT EA Sports FC Ramadan Tournament held in Riyadh for MENA gamers