News outlets branded as ‘fake news’ by Trump allowed back into White House after judge’s order

Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - CNN White House reporter Betsy Klein works in the CNN workspace outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 24, 2026. — AFP pic

WASHINGTON, Sept 25 — CNN, MS NOW and Politico were allowed back into the White House yesterday, six days after being banned by President Donald Trump, following a federal judge’s order that the journalists have their access restored.

District Judge Timothy Kelly ruled overnight that revoking the White House press credentials of the three media outlets “likely violated their constitutional due process rights.”

Reporters for CNN, MS NOW and Politico who attempted to return to the White House early yesterday ahead of a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping were initially turned away by the Secret Service but were allowed in later around midday.

Journalists from other outlets surrounded CNN’s tent on the White House driveway and filmed reporter Betsy Klein as she reported live following her return. “Welcome back,” several journalists said.

In his ruling, Kelly took issue with how the White House went about expelling the three news organisations.

“The ‘general rule’ is that ‘individuals must receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before the Government deprives them’ of a constitutionally protected interest,” the judge said.

Despite regaining access to the complex earlier in the day, CNN reported later yesterday that the White House had “denied two CNN journalists from covering Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s arrival back at the White House for a state dinner.”

The cable network reported that MS NOW journalists were also denied access to the arrival.

Trump has long attacked media that have aired critical coverage of him, repeatedly blasting the press as the “enemy of the people.”

The Republican president barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House on today for distributing what he called “fake news” and “fiction and lies.”

They filed a joint lawsuit asking for a temporary restraining order against the ban on the grounds that it violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which upholds the right to a free press.

Ahead of the ruling, the Department of Justice had argued that Trump can “control reporters’ access to restricted presidential areas, such as the Oval Office.”

“Access to the White House is a privilege — not a right,” it said.

‘National security?’ 

The White House Press Office accused CNN in a letter to the cable news outlet of “trafficking in verifiable falsehoods about national security and other issues, and publishing sensitive or classified information,” with similar accusations levelled against MS NOW and Politico.

The letter to CNN cited several stories about the US-Iran war and a story on Trump’s plans to build a military bunker below the planned East Wing ballroom which allegedly “disclosed ‘top-secret’ construction details.”

Kelly, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, appeared unconvinced.

“The Court is sceptical — at least on this record — that Defendants’ interest in safeguarding national security is the actual motivation for, or is even advanced by, the revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes,” the judge said.

In a rare move, the top five US broadcasters said that they were halting pool coverage of the White House — where a broadcaster films on behalf of all television outlets for the day — in solidarity with CNN.

“The public has a vital interest in receiving accurate, independent information about its government. No administration should restrict a news organisation because it objects to its reporting,” ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC said. — AFP