Hello and welcome to the details of Philippines says disputed reef 'not lost' to China despite pullout and now with the details
Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - Sabina Shoal, which China refers to as Xianbin Reef and the Philippines as the Escoda Shoal, lies west of the Philippine province of Palawan, within the country’s exclusive economic zone. — Reuters pic
MANILA, Sept 16 — The Philippines insisted yesterday that it had not given up a South China Sea reef, two days after it pulled out a ship stationed there following a months-long standoff with rival claimant China.
Manila had deployed the coast guard flagship BRP Teresa Magbanua to Sabina Shoal in April to stop Beijing from building an artificial island there, as it has atop several other disputed spots in the strategic waterway.
But the ship was abruptly called back to the western Philippine island of Palawan, with Manila citing damage from an earlier clash with Chinese ships, ailing crew members, dwindling food and bad weather.
“We have not lost anything. We did not abandon anything. Escoda Shoal is still part of our exclusive economic zone,” Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela told a news conference Monday, using the Filipino name for Sabina Shoal.
Beijing claims most of the South China Sea, including Sabina Shoal, despite an international tribunal ruling that its assertions have no merit.
It has acted aggressively towards Philippine government vessels at Sabina and other disputed areas in recent months, ramming, blocking, water-cannoning and even boarding them, causing damage and injuries.
The confrontations have sparked concern that the United States, a military ally of Manila, could be drawn into armed conflict with China.
Chinese vessels were harassing resupply missions, and Tarriela said the BRP Teresa Magbanua’s water desalinator broke down, forcing the crew to rely on rainwater for drinking “for more than one month now”.
He said the crew were also reduced to “eating porridge for three weeks”, which “obviously is not nutritious”.
Indisputable sovereignty
Following the ship’s pullout, China’s coast guard insisted on Sunday that Beijing “has indisputable sovereignty” over Sabina.
It warned the Philippines to “stop inciting propaganda and risking infringements”, adding Beijing would “continue to carry out rights protection and law enforcement activities” there.
But Tarriela on Monday maintained the withdrawal from Sabina was “not a defeat”, rejecting comparisons to the Scarborough Shoal, which Manila lost to Beijing after a similar months-long standoff in 2012.
He said it would be “impossible” for China to totally stop the Philippines from sending its ships around the 137-square-kilometre (53-square-mile) Sabina Shoal.
“The coast guard can carry out whatever it takes for us to make sure that China will not be able to occupy and even reclaim Escoda Shoal,” he said.
“We have other coast guard vessels that, as we speak right now, may have been or may already be proceeding to Escoda Shoal,” Tarriela said without providing details, citing operational security considerations.
The United States said Monday it continued to support its ally Manila, while slamming the “dangerous ways” Beijing tries to enforce its claim.
“It is up to the Philippines to decide how they operate their vessels in areas where it enjoys the freedom of navigation in the high seas under international law,” State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said.
Sabina is located 140 kilometres (86 miles) west of Palawan and about 1,200 kilometres from Hainan island, the nearest major Chinese landmass. — AFP
These were the details of the news Philippines says disputed reef 'not lost' to China despite pullout for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.