Hello and welcome to the details of Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules and now with the details
Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - A group of climate activists block one of the entrances of the Swedish Parliament during a protest due to the lack of action from the Swedish authorities, on March 11, 2024, in Stockholm, Sweden. — AFP pic
LONDON, March 18 — Environmental activists accused of criminal damage cannot rely on their political or philosophical beliefs as a defence, London’s Court of Appeal ruled today, raising the prospect of more protesters being convicted for direct action.
Various groups have targeted companies and political parties in Britain, causing damage to property in order to raise awareness of climate change issues.
The rise in the use of direct action has prompted a wider crackdown on protest movements in Britain and across Europe, particularly in relation to environmental groups.
Today’s ruling effectively prevents environmental protesters from relying on their beliefs about the dangers of climate change as a defence to criminal damage.
Advertisement
Britain’s Attorney General Victoria Prentis, who asked the Court of Appeal to clarify the law after the acquittal of environmental activists last year, welcomed the decision.
“Climate change is an important issue and while the right to protest must be protected it does not give a right to cause serious criminal damage no matter how strongly held a belief is,” she said in a statement.
In English law, a defendant has a defence to a charge of criminal damage if the property owner would have consented had they been aware of the circumstances behind causing the damage.
Advertisement
Defendants have been cleared by juries after admitting causing damage to property owned by companies including HSBC bank, having argued that those companies would have consented if they had known about the extent and importance of climate change.
The Court of Appeal ruled today, however, that the circumstances in which damage is caused “would not include the political or philosophical beliefs of the person causing the damage”.
Sue Carr, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said that evidence about a defendant’s views on climate change will usually be inadmissible and cannot be put before the jury. — Reuters
These were the details of the news Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.
It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.
