Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules

Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules
Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules

Hello and welcome to the details of Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules and now with the details

Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - A group of climate activists block one of the entrances of the Swedish Parliament during a protest due to the lack of action from the Swedish authorities, on March 11, 2024, in Stockholm, Sweden. — AFP pic

LONDON, March 18 — Environmental activists accused of criminal damage cannot rely on their political or philosophical beliefs as a defence, London’s Court of Appeal ruled today, raising the prospect of more protesters being convicted for direct action.

Various groups have targeted companies and political parties in Britain, causing damage to property in order to raise awareness of climate change issues.

The rise in the use of direct action has prompted a wider crackdown on protest movements in Britain and across Europe, particularly in relation to environmental groups.

Today’s ruling effectively prevents environmental protesters from relying on their beliefs about the dangers of climate change as a defence to criminal damage.

Advertisement

Britain’s Attorney General Victoria Prentis, who asked the Court of Appeal to clarify the law after the acquittal of environmental activists last year, welcomed the decision.

“Climate change is an important issue and while the right to protest must be protected it does not give a right to cause serious criminal damage no matter how strongly held a belief is,” she said in a statement.

In English law, a defendant has a defence to a charge of criminal damage if the property owner would have consented had they been aware of the circumstances behind causing the damage.

Advertisement

Defendants have been cleared by juries after admitting causing damage to property owned by companies including HSBC bank, having argued that those companies would have consented if they had known about the extent and importance of climate change.

The Court of Appeal ruled today, however, that the circumstances in which damage is caused “would not include the political or philosophical beliefs of the person causing the damage”.

Sue Carr, the most senior judge in England and Wales, said that evidence about a defendant’s views on climate change will usually be inadmissible and cannot be put before the jury. — Reuters

These were the details of the news Climate protesters can’t rely on beliefs in criminal damage cases, UK court rules for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

PREV Trump hush money trial loses juror who felt ‘intimidated,’ judge says
NEXT Barrage of Russian attacks aims to cut Ukraine's lights

Author Information

I am Joshua Kelly and I focus on breaking news stories and ensuring we (“Al-KhaleejToday.NET”) offer timely reporting on some of the most recent stories released through market wires about “Services” sector. I have formerly spent over 3 years as a trader in U.S. Stock Market and is now semi-stepped down. I work on a full time basis for Al-KhaleejToday.NET specializing in quicker moving active shares with a short term view on investment opportunities and trends. Address: 838 Emily Drive Hampton, SC 29924, USA Phone: (+1) 803-887-5567 Email: [email protected]