Six US states will not join US$26b opioid settlements with distributors, J&J

Six US states will not join US$26b opioid settlements with distributors, J&J
Six US states will not join US$26b opioid settlements with distributors, J&J

Hello and welcome to the details of Six US states will not join US$26b opioid settlements with distributors, J&J and now with the details

Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - Tablets of the opioid-based Hydrocodone at a pharmacy in Portsmouth, Ohio, June 21, 2017. ― Reuters file pic

WASHINGTON, Aug 24 ― At least six US states, including Georgia, have decided they will not fully sign on to a proposed US$26 billion (RM109.9 billion) settlement with three drug distributors and Johnson & Johnson, which have been accused of fuelling the nation's opioid epidemic, according to the states' attorneys general.

States had until Saturday to decide whether to support the US$21 billion proposed settlement with McKesson Corp, AmerisourceBergen Corp and Cardinal Health Inc and a separate US$5 billion agreement with J&J.

Georgia yesterday was the largest state that said it would not join the settlement.

“At the present time, joining the national settlements does not guarantee the best outcome for Georgia and its counties, cities and citizens,” said the attorney general's office in an email. “We will litigate our claims if needed to yield the greatest possible recovery for all Georgians to address this devastating crisis.”

New Mexico, Oklahoma, Washington and West Virginia also declined to join the deals, their state attorneys general said. New Hampshire agreed to the settlement with distributors but not the J&J agreement.

The complex settlement formula envisions at least 44 states participating, but ultimately the companies get to decide whether a “critical mass” has joined and whether to finalise the deal.

The size of the settlement is based on the number of participating states. Those that decline to join will instead seek a larger recovery by continuing to fight the defendants in the courts. The companies have already paid hundreds of millions in verdicts and other settlements.

The deal, which was unveiled by 14 state attorneys general on July 21, aims to resolve more than 3,000 lawsuits accusing the distributors of ignoring red flags that pain pills were being diverted into communities for illicit uses and that J&J played down the risks of opioid addiction.

The money would go toward funding treatment and other services.

The companies deny wrongdoing, saying the drugs were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and that responsibility for ballooning painkiller sales lies with others, including doctors and regulators.

McKesson said the companies have until September 4 to determine if there is sufficient support for the agreements and said that process is ongoing. Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen declined to comment and J&J did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The support of two other states, Nevada and Alabama, also appeared to be in doubt, according to sources familiar with the situation.

Nevada's attorney general declined to comment and the Alabama attorney general did not respond to a request for comment.

The participation of states is tied closely to that of their local governments, which brought the majority of the lawsuits. Cities and counties within participating states would have through January 2 to sign on. Ultimately, US$10.7 billion of the settlement money is tied to the extent to which localities participate.

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, a lead negotiator, last month said he expected “well north” of 40 states to join. ― Reuters

These were the details of the news Six US states will not join US$26b opioid settlements with distributors, J&J for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

NEXT Explainer: What legal grounds does the UN have to oppose Israel’s ban on UNRWA and what could it mean for Gaza?

Author Information

I am Jeff King and I’m passionate about business and finance news with over 4 years in the industry starting as a writer working my way up into senior positions. I am the driving force behind Al-KhaleejToday.NET with a vision to broaden the company’s readership throughout 2016. I am an editor and reporter of “Financial” category. Address: 383 576 Gladwell Street Longview, TX 75604, USA Phone: (+1) 903-247-0907 Email: [email protected]