US attorney general nominee Garland says ‘no conflicts’ when it comes to Big Tech

US attorney general nominee Garland says ‘no conflicts’ when it comes to Big Tech
US attorney general nominee Garland says ‘no conflicts’ when it comes to Big Tech

Hello and welcome to the details of US attorney general nominee Garland says ‘no conflicts’ when it comes to Big Tech and now with the details

Nevin Al Sukari - Sana'a - Attorney general nominee Merrick Garland testifies during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Washington, DC February 22, 2021. ― Pool via Reuters

Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on news you need to know.

WASHINGTON, Feb 23 ― Merrick Garland, US President Joe Biden's nominee for attorney general, yesterday brushed aside any suggestion that he could come under political pressure to drop the Justice Department's antitrust case against Alphabet's Google.

Garland addressed the issue at his confirmation hearing after Republican Senator Ted Cruz said he was concerned that Garland could come under pressure because of Big Tech donations to the Democrat Biden's presidential campaign.

“I don't expect to talk to any donors. I have no conflicts. I don't own any Google stock,” Garland told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The United States sued Google in October, accusing the US$1 trillion (RM4.04 trillion) company of illegally using its market muscle to hobble rivals. Antitrust experts do not expect the Biden administration to drop the case.

The Senate is widely expected to confirm Garland, a federal appellate judge and former prosecutor, as the top US law enforcement official.

Senator Amy Klobuchar, the Democratic chair of the committee's antitrust panel, urged Garland to press on with additional investigations of Big Tech firms, particularly . The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Facebook in December for anticompetitive behavior.

Garland responded only: “I take it (antitrust enforcement) very seriously and have throughout my entire career.”

She also asked Garland if he would support additional funding for the Justice Department's Antitrust Division and the FTC, which share the job of enforcing antitrust law.

“I always want to be in a position of saying thank you, yes, when you ask whether we want more resources. My expectation is that is what I would say,” he responded. “But if and until I'm confirmed I really can't evaluate what resources we might need.”

Klobuchar introduced a bill this month aimed at strengthening antitrust enforcement. The Bill would increase authorisations to each agency by US$300 million, bringing the FTC to US$651 million and Justice's division to US$484.5 million.

Garland shot down a report that Susan Davies, who recently left the Kirkland & Ellis LLP law firm, would be his assistant attorney general for antitrust.

Garland said that she did not have aspirations to be in the antitrust division, and indicated that it was possible he would hire someone who has worked for one of the tech giants.

“Unfortunately or fortunately, a lot of the best antitrust lawyers in the country have some involvement in one way or another in some part of high tech and we can't exclude every single good lawyer from being able to be in that division,” he said. ― Reuters

These were the details of the news US attorney general nominee Garland says ‘no conflicts’ when it comes to Big Tech for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at Malay Mail and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

PREV Australia says politicians no longer exempt from sexual harassment rules
NEXT Thailand reports 405 new coronavirus cases, no new deaths