Sweden is sorry – was not the worst on the OECD’s...

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently presented a report to its 35 member countries on how they have handled the corona pandemic.

Sweden did very poorly there and the OECD pointed out, among other things, that the country struggled the most to reduce the so-called r-number, the reproduction number which shows how many an infected person on average infects further. Sweden did poorly in reducing the infection, getting people to isolate themselves and getting people discharged from the intensive care unit.

Background: Sweden is singled out as corona aggravation

According to the OECD, it took Malta, which was best in class, only eleven days to bring the r number down to less than one, while in Sweden it took 58 days, the worst of all countries according to statistics. In comparison, Norway spent 27 days.

Revealed number curl

The Swedes have complained about the numbers. According to SVT, which pointed out the error, the organization has mixed up the number of tests per 100,000 inhabitants divided into days and weeks for several countries, including Sweden.

– The value is seven times too high. According to them, we were almost at the top when it comes to the number of tests and that is not true, says Anders Björkman, professor of infectious diseases at Karolinska Institutet to SVT.

– It is frightening and amazing that they get through these factual errors. This shows a lack of insight into the covid epidemic, says Björkman to the channel.

Sweden’s state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell has also been critical of the report and said that the OECD has not understood the complexity of the data, but only looked at them as economic figures.

Admits mistakes

Confronted with the calculation error, Guillaume Dedet in the health department of the OECD admits that they have missed.

– It is a calculation error for Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. We will update the report in the next few days, he says in a statement to the channel.

In another study, conducted by Bloomberg, Sweden ended up in 16th place out of 53 countries surveyed when they looked at the overall picture of how the pandemic has been handled. In comparison, Finland (5th place), Norway (6th place) and Denmark (9th place) all ended up in the top ten of the 53 countries in the ranking.


Source link by https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/verden/2020/11/27/195722824/sverige-far-beklagelse-var-ikke-versting-pa-oecds-coronaliste-likevel

*The article has been translated based on the content of Source link by https://www.abcnyheter.no/nyheter/verden/2020/11/27/195722824/sverige-far-beklagelse-var-ikke-versting-pa-oecds-coronaliste-likevel
. If there is any problem regarding the content, copyright, please leave a report below the article. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!

*We just want readers to access information more quickly and easily with other multilingual content, instead of information only available in a certain language.

*We always respect the copyright of the content of the author and always include the original link of the source article.If the author disagrees, just leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the request of the author. Thanks very much! Best regards!

These were the details of the news Sweden is sorry – was not the worst on the OECD’s... for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at time24.news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

PREV Trump meets Argentina's Milei ahead of conservative summit
NEXT Explainer: What legal grounds does the UN have to oppose Israel’s ban on UNRWA and what could it mean for Gaza?