Samuel Paty, account of the manhunt of a black hussar

---

If for the moment we lack complete information on the Islamist terrorist at the origin of the attack which occurred in front of the college of Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, we can already affirm that he is not the only guilty of this crime, because Samuel Paty was the victim of a massive, false and hateful campaign in the name of the fight against “Islamophobia”, the same fight which aims to establish the offense of blasphemy for Islam in France.

---

This Friday, Samuel Paty, 47, professor of history and geography at the college of Bois-d’Aulne was slaughtered in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine. The assailant is an 18-year-old man born in Moscow who allegedly yelled “allah akbar” before murdering his victim. He was shot dead by the police a few streets away from the scene of the crime, in Éragny-sur-Oise, a knife in his hand.

How did this teacher find himself in the sights of the Islamists?

It is on social networks that the lynching would have started …

Through a video posted on Facebook, the father of a student of 4th, Brahim C., calls on all the parents of his daughter’s comrades to mobilize against a history-geography teacher who allegedly showed “the photo of a naked man” during his lesson to designate him as the “prophet of Muslims ”.

“What is the message he wanted to convey to these children?” What is hatred? Why this hatred? »Asks Brahim C. He explains that during one of his lessons, the teacher asked the Muslim students to raise their hands and then leave the classroom. Her 13-year-old daughter reportedly refused to go out and was shocked when the famous “photo” was released. Still in the same video, the father explains that his daughter would have been sanctioned, excluded from the course for two days, because she had refused to leave the classroom at the request of the teacher.

To read also, the editorial of Elisabeth Lévy: Charlie Hebdo, how many divisions?

“If you think like me that we must say STOP, do not touch our children, send me a text message at 06 XX XX XX XX”, this is the conclusion that the father sends to the parents of pupils of the 4th college… He vows for a collective action against this teacher whom he describes as a “thug who must go and educate himself”, a man visibly harmful to the students and whom he suspects, still according to his words, of ‘acted’ that way ‘in school for years.

In another video, the daughter of Brahim C. and the victim’s pupil speaks in turn. She recounts her version of the incident that pitted her against her teacher. Before she can speak, the man holding the camera, Abdelhakim Sefrioui, an Islamist who has raged in France since the 1980s, known for his support for Hamas and member of the Council of Imams of France, declares that “The abject has taken place again. This week we witnessed the response of a thug, who is a teacher, to this call from the President of the Republic which is a call to hate Muslims, to fight Muslims, to stigmatize Muslims ”. Asked by Sefrioui, Zaina’s version is slightly different from her father’s:

“We were doing a class on Islam and the teacher told Muslims to raise their hands (…) and that he will show an image that will perhaps shock, that if we wanted, we could go out of the course ”she says. The young girl adds that the image in question was that of “the prophet Muhammad without clothes and that the teacher had shown it like that”. She expresses her shock and insists that “even the non-Muslim students” were in turn shocked at the sight of the image. “They do not respect us, for them we are not their equals while we are humans like them” she said indignantly.

The teacher would have informed this pupil that she was disturbing her class and would have excluded her because she would have “expressed” her feelings, that she was offended. “Why is he attacking our religion? I will no longer go to his class ”, testifies this student who considers that these images had no place in a history-geography lesson, that the intention of the professor was to target Islam in order to “demean Muslim students” in his class.

Defamatory campaign

The teacher would therefore have left the choice to his students and taken into account their sensitivity before proceeding to the distribution of the images. He had anticipated the stir that this might have caused in some of these Muslim students. So he didn’t just exclude students from his class because of their confession.

However, this is not what Brahim C. broadcast